The History of Rheumatoid Arthritis

European Musculoskeletal Review, 2011;6(3):145-7

Abstract

While rheumatoid arthritis (RA) today is understood as a multifactorial disease, it is a conundrum that the disease first evolved in the Western world only about 200 years ago. On the other hand, remains of Indian skeletons with RA dating from 4,500 BC have been found in what is now known as Tennessee in the US. One hypothesis is that RA may have spread by migration from the original catchment area of RA into areas with French, English, Dutch and Spanish incursion and then have penetrated into Europe. Only in 1,800 Augustin Jacob Landré-Beauvais in his medical dissertation at the medical school in Paris hypothesised a new diagnosis of what we today understand as RA; for a long time manifestations of RA had been interpreted as manifestations of gout. Various names were used for the manifestations of RA and the term RA was finally classified by the American Rheumatism Association in 1958 and 1987.
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, history, classification, literature, term, archaeology
Disclosure The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Received: March 16, 2011 Accepted July 28, 2011
Correspondence: Till Uhlig, National Research Center for Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Postbox 23 Vinderen, N-0319 Oslo, Norway. E: till.uhlig@diakonsyk.no

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is today understood as a multifactorial disease. Though recent advances have been made concerning our understanding of the pathogenesis and aetiology of the disease, we still do not know specifically what causes RA and why some individuals and not others are prone to developing it. In addition, it is puzzling that RA evolved as a problem in the Western world only a little more than 200 years ago, even though evidence for RA was seen in skeletal remains from Indian dating from 4500 BC. Awareness of opportunities to treat RA effectively has grown, especially during the last decade where biological treatment alternatives have evolved. We also see now that the severity of RA is decreasing, and RA has become less frequent, reducing overall the considerable impact which RA has had on affected individuals and on society.

Archaeological Findings
The earliest appearance of RA was noted in remains of Indian skeletons dating from 4500 BC found in what is now known as Tennessee. Persistence of the disease in that region could be documented in several areas, as well as expansion into Ohio, first in a period about 1,000 years ago. As a consequence it seems possible that RA then spread to the Old World before it was again seen in the New World in 1785.1 Rothschild has hypothesised how RA may have spread by migration from the original catchment area of RA into areas with French, English, Dutch and Spanish incursion. This hypothesis could explain how RA, initially geographically localised in an area protected from exploration, may have spread into the colonised New World and finally penetrated into the Old World in Europe.

For decades there has been a discussion as to whether RA is a disease with its origin in newer or older times. Those who claim that RA has not developed until recently have referred to the lack of evidence for it in the literature or written documentation, artwork or bones. While evidence of spondyloarthropathy in the Old World is abundant in the literature, evidence of RA in the pre-Columbian Old World has not been clearly documented.

The question when RA first manifested is relevant not only because of scientific relevance, but because it contributes to our perception of the disease in the context of our daily work or in a patient’s identity. Regarding research, epidemiology concerning the geographical spread of RA may point to the aetiology. If RA first evolved in the 19th century, this may have been caused by an environmental factor which did not exist earlier.

References:
  1. Rothschild BM, Woods RJ, Rothschild C, Sebes JI, Geographic distribution of rheumatoid arthritis in ancient North America: implications for pathogenesis, Semin Arthritis Rheum, 1992;22:181–7.
  2. Leden I, Persson E, Persson O, Aspects of the history of rheumatoid arthritis in the light of recent osteoarchaeological finds, Scand J Rheumatol, 1988;17:341–52.
  3. Landré-Beauvais AJ, The first description of rheumatoid arthritis. Unabridged text of the doctoral dissertation presented in 1800, Joint Bone Spine, 2001;68:130–43.
  4. Garrod AB, Treatise on nature and treatment of gout and rheumatic gout, London: Walton and Maberly, 1859.
  5. Uhlig T, Heiberg T, Mowinckel P, Kvien TK, Rheumatoid arthritis is a milder disease in the new millennium: Health status in RA patients 1994–2004, Ann Rheum Dis, 2008;67:1710–5.